Ok, I was just reading Dwarfsofts article on the Future of RPGs (nice work ) and as I was reading parts about talking to NPCs and in particular the line "What do you want to talk about?" an idea struck me (this is very rare for me ), because the line doesn''t really sound right (have you ever met someone and they say "What do you want to talk about?" as the first thing when you meet them?) because that is not how a conversation works. So what is my brilliant (subjective opinion {or is that objective, I always get them mixed up}) idea??? The "Brain Interface". Basically, there is a section managed just like an inventory in say Deus Ex, where you click and drag things into it, except in this case, it is the mind. So if you want to talk about an NPC Bob, you might drag a picture of Bob into your mind. Then when you meet an NPC and start talking, the computer takes over and acts out the conversation with the NPC. While this happens, the player (being controlled by the computer) would bring up topics of discussion in a natural way and the NPC would answer them also in appropriate ways. There are obvoiously some problems that need to be dealt with but the way my mind sees it, it could solve a few problems: 1) No need to use keyboard 2) No restricting choices ("You can say "Hello", "Give me food" etc) 3) The plot can still be moved along fairly easily since the computer is controlling the player 4) We have more power yet the player feels like they have more power. So what do you think? Would the player feel as if they don''t have enough control? (That is my major concern) As for the programming side, I don''t think it is impossible, I''ve already got the basic design worked out in my head which is a good sign that it is possible. hmmmmmmm? Disclaimer: Due to lack of money, not-so-good computer and moral dislike for warez, I don''t play many RPGs, so I might be leaving out some really big points.... sorry Trying is the first step towards failure.

That''s an interesting idea. You could even go further by letting the player construct sentences w/ different icons. That way the player doesn''t have to guess what words the designers used. All the possibilities would be right there, and the player can use them in different ways.


"All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be --Pink Floyd
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Need help? Well, go FAQ yourself.

Click here to see my current project.

*Dwarfsoft makes a few grunts of approval as he scrolls through the thread*
*Dwarfsoft starts taking some notes for the updated doc*
Nice work raggy... Looks like you get another mention

-Chris Bennett of Dwarfsoft - Site:"The Philosophers'' Stone of Programming Alchemy" - IOL
The future of RPGs - Thanks to all the goblins over in our little Game Design Corner niche
          

Yeah, I was kind of thinking maybe you would need a memrory system too, either automatically updated or the player clicks on something to add it to their memory. If it were to be auto updated, then there would need to be groups and stuff otherwise it would get a bit too big to manage.

From the memory, you could then drag stuff into the mind.

The other thing which I originally intendid, was that the conversation didn''t stop to wait for your input, so once you had put stuff into your mind, and started the conversation, you don''t get to change it, although now I think about it, that may be better.

Another thing might be to change the mood, so you could talk in a aggressive manner or a polite manner or whatever.


Trying is the first step towards failure.

Good ideas, I''m just thinking, how much extra work would be needed (for the artist) to draw like a 32x32 icon to represent every object/thought that the player encounters, and when this is encountered, the icon pops up on the screen. So say the player meets Bob, next to Bob, a little portrait of him would show up. Then while talking to Bob, Bob might mention a lighthouse, which then pops up the lighthouse picture on the screen. So the player then associates the picture with the building.

But some things you just could not do with icons you are right, so it gets a bit tricky there =)

Trying is the first step towards failure.