🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉
Not many can claim 25 years on the Internet! Join us in celebrating this milestone. Learn more about our history, and thank you for being a part of our community!
.NET 2.0
it said "minimum" system requirements on the contests page, one of which was .net 1.1
.net 1.1 has absolutly horible data stuctures, is thier any posible way we can get that uped to 2.0? if we include a redistributable?
You can use .NET 2.0 if and only if it's no longer beta by the time we judge it. We won't install the beta framework on our machines.
So, if you want to gamble on the release date, you can. Just expect to be disqualified if you lose your bet.
So, if you want to gamble on the release date, you can. Just expect to be disqualified if you lose your bet.
Richard "Superpig" Fine - saving pigs from untimely fates - Microsoft DirectX MVP 2006/2007/2008/2009
"Shaders are not meant to do everything. Of course you can try to use it for everything, but it's like playing football using cabbage." - MickeyMouse
Er... Eh?! .NET 1.1 data structures hori..what?! .NET 2.what?!
Not that I'm not aware of .NET 2.0, but how come .NET 1.1 data structures are horrible? Which ones are horrible and what makes them horrible? I've been making use of .NET 1.1 in some of my programs, and it works just fine.
What new improvements/features are there in .NET 2.0?
Not that I'm not aware of .NET 2.0, but how come .NET 1.1 data structures are horrible? Which ones are horrible and what makes them horrible? I've been making use of .NET 1.1 in some of my programs, and it works just fine.
What new improvements/features are there in .NET 2.0?
Quote: Original post by Cibressus
having to box, then unbox things from the list.
This problem is c++ specific. Other Managed languages handle the value type aggregation automatically, so manual boxing/unboxing is not needed.
Niko Suni
Quote: Original post by Nik02Quote: Original post by Cibressus
having to box, then unbox things from the list.
This problem is c++ specific. Other Managed languages handle the value type aggregation automatically, so manual boxing/unboxing is not needed.
Automatic, yes but I believe that without generics it's still type-unsafe which is probably what he means. Or perhaps he means the speed hit?
Andrew <--- who's probably wrong...
------------------------------------Development of Rock, Paper, Scissors - The Third Dimension
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement