And I don't agree with you, because I learned a lot of fundamental stuff from here. When I ask for feedback, everyone is giving me high quality feedback and I don't get that in uni.
As amazing as it may sound to you, a lot of that quality stuff is coming from university education, and practical experience.
I think you expect to learn the wrong things in University.
A University teaches you foremost how to make sense out of chaos and invent new things. You get these huge unstructured seemingly impossible problems. (Extreme example: Invent the next generation X thingie, must be twice as fast, and 3 times lighter, preferably done in a year please.) It's up to you to unravel the problem into a nice structure, so you can reason about it, and find a novel solution (current X thingie has already taken all technology to the edge, so twice as fast and three times lighter is not a simple extrapolation of existing technology). Unlike the normal solutions, novel solutions don't exist at the Internet. They also cannot be asked about at a forum, since they are completely new, nobody has ever tried anything like it. Most people don't even understand your problem.
To do that you need a deep understanding of all the subjects and all theory, at the level where you can mix and match various pieces of theory, and do the impossible.
Note that the real interesting stuff is not at the global overview level. The real good stuff is in the deep details. Those details make that the solution is a solution. You need those details to understand how to solve your future impossible problems.
When reading a solution to a problem it often looks extremely trivial often, I agree. This is also the experience of a researcher, in fact, it's often a sign that the solution is a really good one. The point is however, you have to find such a solution in your chaos problem without knowing where to look or which direction to go for an answer, in fact, you don't even know if the problem is solvable at all.
What a university doesn't do is learn you practical things. You won't learn real-world programming, using a version control system, or how to install a computer, or whatever.
If you're bored, why not make it interesting for yourself?
I spent a lot of time digging around in a Linux machine, figuring out how it worked in detail, what all the system calls do, how to use a tape drive, etc.
EDIT: I also spend years inventing little interesting problems, and try to solve them with a computer. If it failed, I needed more thinking, if it worked, I was sure I could find a better solution than I had. Both were true.
Also, any university has a huuuuge library with more books than you can read (for a long time, I read every book I could lay my hands on). It also has access to many research papers published in journals. It covers all topics you can imagine, and more.
In all, it doesn't matter much what you do, but spend your time learning, now is your chance.
One option you could do, is learning what the courses aim to do, but at a deeper level.